ABSTRACT
Objectives: Malnutrition is a prevalent condition affecting 30-50% of hospitalized patients. Malnutrition is linked to impairments in health outcomes and increased economic burden on healthcare systems. We assessed the prevalence and burden of malnutrition by examining demographic characteristics, Disease Related Group (DRG) payments and associated claims among Medicare inpatients (65+ years) with and without COVID-19. Method(s): Hospital inpatient COVID-19 claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) between October 2020 - September 2021 were analyzed. The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) were used for malnutrition diagnoses. Demographic variables were compared based on the COVID-19 status;economic burden was analyzed by DRG payment of malnutrition cases with and without COVID-19. Result(s): Among 7,394,657 Medicare inpatient claims, only 12% had a documented malnutrition diagnosis. Of these patients, 1.2% had COVID-19. Regardless of COVID-19 status, malnourished patients averaged 75 years of age, and were predominantly female (54%) and White (78%) followed by Black (14%), and Hispanic (2%). Sepsis, kidney failure, and urinary tract infection (UTI) were the most common primary diagnoses in malnourished patients, regardless of COVID-19 status. Malnourished patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher DRG payments ($27,407 vs. $18,327) and increased cost of outlier payment ($3,208 vs. $2,049) compared to those without COVID-19, regardless of other diagnoses. Conclusion(s): Malnutrition diagnosis was confirmed in only 12% of the Medicare inpatients, thus suggesting that malnutrition continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated - evidenced by high rates of hospitalizations/claims and payments in both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases. It is imperative for hospitals to implement nutrition-focused protocols to identify, diagnose and address malnutrition among all Medicare inpatients regardless of COVID-19 status (and especially among patients with sepsis, kidney failure, and UTI). Nutrition-focused protocols can effectively improve patient health outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed significant burden on Brazil's health system. The present study aims to describe patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, vaccine uptake and assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with acute COVID-19 in Brazil during the Omicron predominant period. Method(s): A population-based retrospective study was conducted using the National Health Data Network (RNDS), National Vaccination Campaign against COVID-19 data and surveillance data in public setting. Individuals with positive COVID-19 test results between January-April 2022 were identified. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, vaccination status, HCRU for those who were admitted to hospitals and their associated costs were described by age groups. Result(s): A total of 8,160,715 COVID-19 cases were identified and 2.7% were aged <5 years, 11.6% were 5-19 years, 76.9% were 20-64 years and 8.7% were >= 65 years. The presence of comorbidity was 23.1% with a higher prevalence of comorbidities in the elderly (61.8% for 65-74 years and 71.2% for >=75 years). Regarding COVID -19 vaccination uptake, among those aged <=19 years, 20-64 years and >=65 years, 40.6%, 86.5% and 92.2% had primary series, respectively. Among adults, the booster uptake was 47.3% and 75.8% for those aged 20-64 years and >= 65 years, respectively. Among those with confirmed COVID-19, regardless of vaccination status, 87% were being symptomatic and 1.7% were hospitalized (3.8% in aged <5 years, 4.2% in 5-19 years, 34.3% in 20-64 years and 57.6% in >= 65 years). Among hospitalized patients, 32,6% were admitted to ICU and 80% required mechanical ventilation support. The average cost per day in normal wards and ICU without ventilation was R$291,89 and R$923,90, respectively. Conclusion(s): Our results quantify the public health and economic burden of COVID-19 in Brazil, suggesting substantial healthcare resources required to manage the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The COVID pandemic has imposed significant direct medical cost and resource use burden on healthcare systems. This study described the patient demographic and clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with acute COVID in adults in England. Method(s): This population-based retrospective study used linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink, CPRD, Aurum) and secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics) data to identify: 1) hospitalized (admitted within 12 weeks of a positive COVID-19 PCR test between August 2020 and March 2021) and 2) non-hospitalized patients (positive test between August 2020 and January 2022 and managed in the community). Hospitalization and primary care costs, 12 weeks after COVID diagnosis, were calculated using 2021 UK healthcare reference costs. Result(s): We identified 1,706,368 adult COVID cases. For hospitalized (n=13,105) and non-hospitalized (n=1,693,263) cohorts, 84% and 41% considered high risk for severe COVID using PANORAMIC criteria and 41% and 13% using the UKHSA's Green Book for prioritized immunization groups, respectively. Among hospitalized cases, median (IQR) length of stay was 5 (2-7), 6 (4-10), 8 (5-14) days for 18-49 years, 50-64 years and >= 65 years, respectively;6% required mechanical ventilation support, and median (IQR) healthcare costs (critical care cost excluded) per-finished consultant episode due to COVID increased with age (18-49 years: 4364 (1362-4471), 50-64 years: 4379 (4364-5800), 65-74 years: 4395 (4364-5800), 75-84 years: 4473 (4364-5800) and 85+ years: 5800 (4370-5807). Among non-hospitalized cases, older adults were more likely to seek GP consultations (13% of persons age 85+, 9% age 75-84, 7% age 65-74, 5% age 50-64, 3% age 18-49). Of those with at least 1 GP visit, the median primary care consultation total cost in the non-hospitalized cohort was 16 (IQR 16-31). Conclusion(s): Our results quantify the substantial economic burden required to manage adult patients in the acute phase of COVID in England.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: To estimate the direct costs of hospital care according to coinfection in adult COVID-19 patients. Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective follow-up study of adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March and August 2020 at the San Vicente Foundation Hospitals (Medellin and Rionegro, Colombia). Patients whose diagnosis of SARS-Cov2 pneumonia was confirmed by RT-PCR test were included. Death from any cause and length of stay were considered outcome variables. Costs were estimated in 20 20 US dollars. Result(s): 365 patients with an average age of 60 years (IQR: 46-71), 40% female, were analyzed. 60.5% required an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). All-cause mortality was 2.87 per 100 patient-days. Patients admitted to the ICU who developed coinfection had an average length of stay of 27.8 days (SD:17.1) and an average cost of $23,935.7 (SD: $16,808.2);patients admitted to the ICU who did not develop a coinfection had an average length of stay of 14.7 days (SD:8.6) and an average cost of $9,968.5 (SD: $8,054.0). Conclusion(s): A high percentage of patients required intensive care, and there was a high mortality due to COVID-19. In addition, a higher cost of care was observed for those patients who developed coinfection and were admitted to ICU.Copyright © 2023 Asociacion Colombiana de Infectologia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To provide an update overview on the current status of healthcare systems in the Maghreb region (Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia) and to emphasize the progress made in the midst of the challenges facing these countries. Method(s): A descriptive comparative approach of healthcare systems in the three countries, based on data from sources with an established methodology, including descriptive healthcare data from the WHO database. Result(s): The population of the Maghreb will increase from 102 million to 132 million by 2050. The current population is mostly centered in Algeria and Morocco, accounting for 77%. Annual healthcare expenditure per capita is 447.9$, 776.8$ and 854.6$ in Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria, respectively. The average infant mortality rate per 1000 live improved to 10.9 in Tunisia, 16.8 in Morocco and 18.9 in Algeria. Maternal mortality rates have dropped to 43 and 48.5/100 000 births in Tunisia and Algeria, respectively while remaining relatively high in Morocco: 72.6. Number of hospital beds/1000 inhabitants is only 1.1 in Morocco, 1.9 and 2.9 in Algeria and Tunisia, respectively. The number of physicians/1000 people was 0.73 in Morocco, 1.3 in Tunisia and 1.72 in Algeria. This remains considerably low compared to the 3.9/1000 in Europe. The Maghreb countries are currently facing an exodus of physicians, mainly to France, which represents 7.1% and 10.7% of Tunisians and Moroccans, respectively, and more than 24% for Algerians. The Maghreb countries were very early mobilized (governments, ministries of health, civil society) to fight against COVID-19 and have successfully controlled the pandemic, according to pre-established control strategies and the strongly commitment of health professional. Conclusion(s): Despite the considerable progress made, the Maghreb countries still face major challenges. Physicians migration, rising cost of care and endemic infectious disease outbreaks constitute a huge hurdle on the already overburdened and resilient healthcare systems.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Antimicrobial resistance is caused by and exacerbates social and health inequalities. Human and animal antimicrobial use is contributing as much as societal failures to dispose of and manage our waste and respect our environment. A multisector, multidisciplinary approach is required to resolve these issues.Copyright © ERS 2023.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Since the last decade, the notion of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has gained worldwide rapid popularity. Bangladesh is not far from mastering this technique due to the increasing interest of both patients and surgeons. Meanwhile, during this COVID-19 era could it help patients, remains the main question. In this context, we have operated on a total of 523 patients from October 2020 to November 2021 including, 89 patients who were MICS and among them, 17 were coronary artery bypass grafting. Method(s): We have included all patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery surgery in our hospital from October 2020 to November 2021 irrespective of single (MIDCAB) / multi-vessel disease (MICAS) or combined valve replacement with coronary revascularization. Data were collected from the hospital database, telephone conversations, and direct clinic visits. All data were analyzed statistically and expressed in the form of tables. Result(s): In the last 14 months of pandemics we have operated on a total of 89 MICS patients, among them 10 were Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB), 6 were double or triple vessels coronary artery surgery (MICAS), 1 patient underwent upper-mini aortic valve replacement along with coronary revascularization. One of our patients needed re-exploration for chest wall bleeding on the same day. Mean ICU and hospital stay in our series were less than conventional revascularization. There was no in-hospital or 30 days' mortality in our series. Conclusion(s): Cardiac surgery these days is headed toward less invasive approaches with the aid of technology, advanced instruments, and pioneer's lead. But from our in-hospital results we conclude that by avoiding median sternotomy, these minimal invasive revascularization techniques can provide hope to the patients by alleviating symptoms with restored vascularity, reduced morbidity, preventing sudden cardiac death. Health costs reduction with shorter hospital and ICU stay are the added benefits.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The physiological changes in the respiratory and cardiovascular systems in the immunosuppressed state of pregnancy may exacerbate clinical features and deteriorate outcomes due to COVID-19 infection. We aimed to compare the maternal and neonatal adverse effects in the first and second COVID-19 waves. Methodology: This study was a prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care COVID-19-dedicated hospital. In total, 104 (group A) and 96 (group B) COVID-19-positive pregnant women admitted during the first and second waves, respectively, were included in the study. Data on baseline variables, associated comorbidities, clinical presentations, management strategies, and neonatal and maternal outcomes were collected and compared using parametric and nonparametric tests and analyzed. Result(s): Around 2.08% in group A and 6.72% in group B of COVID-19-infected pregnant women, respectively, had moderate-to-severe disease and required intensive care unit stay. Almost 1.04% in group A and 3.84% in group B had maternal mortality, 13.4% and 19.8% babies of groups A and B required admission in neonatal intensive care units, and 8.6% and 7.3% of newborns in groups A and B had COVID-19-positive reports by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at birth, respectively. Of them, 2.1% newborns in group B had RT-PCR positive on day 7 of life and beyond, whereas none had positive RT-PCR reports on 7 days and beyond in group A. Conclusion(s): Dreadful maternal outcomes like requirement of ICU and mechanical ventilator and persistence of neonatal infections were higher during the second wave.Copyright © The Author(s). 2023.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Efforts to combat COVID-19 have largely focused on vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions to decrease hospitalization and death and to reduce transmission. First generation COVID-19 direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are only authorized for high-risk patients to reduce individual risk of disease progression. However, DAAs can also impact transmission by reducing viral load, thereby shortening the duration of infectivity. Next generation oral DAAs in development may have safety profiles that are amenable to broader eligibility and use. This analysis estimates the economic and clinical impact of increasing the utilization of DAAs to treat COVID-19. Method(s): A susceptible-infected-recovered-susceptible model was developed to estimate COVID-19-related outcomes based on DAA uptake. Cost-savings modeled included reduced healthcare utilization amongst individual patients and, importantly, potential savings attributable to reduced transmission. Cost inputs included treatment acquisition costs, adverse events, healthcare utilization, and productivity losses based on published literature. One million individuals were assessed with clinical and economic outcomes estimated for DAA adoption by risk level. Result(s): The model projects 402,330 new infections per 1 million individuals annually, leading to 6,000 hospitalizations and 107 deaths. By increasing DAA use by 10% in the high-risk population and 20% in the standard-risk population, infections decreased to 312,000, with 1,800 fewer hospitalizations and 34 fewer deaths. Decreases in medical encounters were driven by reduction in transmission (77% of the decrease) and reduction in severity amongst those treated (23% of the decrease). Among deaths averted, 72% were attributable to the reduction in transmission. Overall, costs decrease by 23.5% with increased treatment. Conclusion(s): This study is among the first to model the potential population-level impact of DAAs in reducing infectivity and transmission, a factor currently under-emphasized in the literature. New DAAs under development with potentially improved safety profiles may expand the uptake of treatment and substantially reduce the clinical and economic burden of COVID-19.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum captures primary care electronic healthcare records for ~28% of the population in England. From August 2020-;March 2022, all SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests performed were reported back to the patient's general practitioner (GP), making the CPRD a closed system uniquely positioned to answer COVID research questions. Method(s): We defined persons with COVID as those recorded in primary care with a positive PCR test from August 1, 2020-March 31, 2021. We required continuous registration with their GP practice for >=365 days prior to diagnosis to establish comorbid conditions, and eligibility for linkage to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care data. Hospitalizations for COVID were defined as persons admitted with a primary diagnosis of COVID (ICD-10-CM U07.1) within 12 weeks of the initial primary care diagnosis record. Result(s): Our cohort included 535,453 persons diagnosed in primary care with COVID, with 2% later hospitalized. The hospitalized group was 57% male, 42% current/former smokers, 35% obese46% with a Charlson Comorbidity Index >1 and 98% had never received any COVID vaccine. Hospitalizations increased with age;<0.1% of patients aged 1-17, 1% aged 18-49, 4% aged 50-64, 9% aged 65-74, 13% aged 74-84, and 11% of COVID cases aged >=85 were hospitalized. Persons living in socially disadvantaged areas were overrepresented in the hospitalized cohort (25% in the Index of Multiple Deprivation's most deprived quintile). Conclusion(s): Consistent with other studies, hospitalized COVID patients were disproportionately those with male sex, smoking history, high body mass index, comorbidity and unvaccinated status. Hospitalizations were more common with age, and for individuals living in socially and economically deprived communities. Understanding the demographic and clinical characteristics of this cohort can help contextualize future work describing healthcare resource utilization and costs, as well as the impact of vaccines, associated with COVID in England.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Lyme disease is a poorly understood condition which starts with a rash but may continue with chronic fatigue and neurological symptoms. Approximately 1 in 5 early Lyme disease patients have GI symptoms, such as nausea, anorexia, abdominal pain, or diarrhea. Lyme disease is thought to be cased by microbes in the spirochetes phylum transmitted by black legged ticks. Lyme-related healthcare costs in America exceed 1.3 billion dollars annually. Bifidobacteria are known for their beneficial probiotic actions within the human gut microbiome. Their numbers are reduced in severe COVID-19, Clostridioides difficile infection and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. To our knowledge Bifidobacteria levels have not been studied in Lyme disease patients. Given the importance of Bifidobacterium abundance in other diseases, we focused on relative abundance of Bifidobacterium in fecal samples of patients with Lyme disease compared to controls. Method(s): Fecal samples were assessed for relative abundance of Bifidobacterium in Healthy Control subjects without Lyme disease (n=20) compared to patients with Lyme disease (n=39). The average symptom duration in patients with Lyme disease was 5 years and none were on antibiotics 2 weeks prior to sample collection (range of symptoms from 1 month to 20 years, all treated initially with antibiotics).Metagenomics Next Generation sequencing was performed on fecal samples, where DNA samples were extracted and normalized for library downstream analysis using Shotgun Methodology. Mann- Whitney Statistical test was used for comparison. This study was IRB approved. Result(s): Relative Abundance of bifidobacteria was significantly decreased (p< 0.0001) in patients with Lyme disease. Median and interquartile range (IQR) were: Control (Median:4.175%;IQR:1.72-10.27%) and Lyme disease (Median:0.0014%;IQR:0.00%-0.96%)(Figure). 30/39 Lyme disease patients (77%) were found to possess < 1% relative abundance of Bifidobacterium in their stool sample. Of interest only 1/39 samples showed presence of Spirochetes in stool samples. Conclusion(s): This is the first study that demonstrates low levels of Bifidobacteria in patients with chronic Lyme disease. These results raise three questions;whether the disease was caused by 1. the original microbe creating loss of Bifidobacterium 2. baseline low Bifidobacteria due likely to either diet or medications or 3. excessive treatment. Given Lyme disease comprises a gut dysbiosis issue, therapies should also aim at restoration of depleted Bifidobacteria. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted drastic containment measures and a rearrangement of healthcare services, with reduction of melanoma diagnoses and related activities.1 It has been hypothesized that the lockdown may have led to a delay in diagnosis, resulting in an increase in melanoma upstaging cases and healthcare costs.2 Several series of melanoma management have been published in various Italian centers with variable results.3,4 Methods: We collected melanomas and melanocytic nevi diagnosed from January 2019 to December 2021 at Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma. Differences in the number of diagnoses, histopathological characteristics, diagnostictherapeutic pathway and staging were evaluated. Result(s): There were no significant differences between 2019 and 2020 in the number of melanomas, while there was a decrease in 2021 (540 vs 554 vs 407), determined by a reduction in melanomas in situ (395 vs 412 vs 238, p<0.001) rather than invasive melanomas. The Breslow thickness, excluding melanomas in situ, was not significantly increased in 2020 and 2021. A reduction of ulcerated melanoma was observed in 2020 (13.6% vs 5.3% vs 9.3%, p 0.04), contrary to the literature in the Covid-19 era (4). No significant differences were observed in the type and duration of diagnostic-therapeutic pathway and the staging. On the other hand, there was a reduction in the number of nevi between 2019 and 2020 (2608 vs 1452, p<0.001), with an increased percentage of dysplastic/atypical vs common nevi (6.6% vs 83.5% in 2019 and 21.3% vs 67.6% in 2020, p<0.001). Conclusion(s): Unlike other studies, we analyzed both melanomas and nevi for a longer period than lockdown. In particular we observed a marked decrease of nevi (especially common nevi), but no worsening of invasive melanomas, Breslow thickness, diagnostic-therapeutic pathway and staging. These data corroborate the results of a patient-based IMI survey (5), in which no worsening of melanoma management was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.
ABSTRACT
Comprehensive medication management (CMM) is increasingly provided by health care teams through telehealth or hybrid modalities. The purpose of this scoping literature review was to assess the published literature and examine the economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes of CMM services provided by pharmacists via telehealth or hybrid modalities. This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included if they: reported on economic, clinical, or humanistic outcomes;were conducted via telehealth or hybrid modalities;included a pharmacist on their interprofessional team;and evaluated CMM services. The search was conducted between January 1, 2000, and September 28, 2021. The search strategy was adapted for use in Medline (PubMed);Embase;Cochrane;Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature;PsychINFO;International Pharmaceutical s;Scopus;and grey literature. Four reviewers extracted data using a screening tool developed for this study and reviewed for risk of bias. Authors screened 3500 articles, from which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 observational studies, 2 RCTs). In seven studies, clinical outcomes improved with telehealth CMM interventions compared to either usual care, face-to-face CMM, or educational controls, as shown by the statistically significant changes in chronic disease clinical outcomes. Two studies evaluated and found increased patient and provider satisfaction. One study described a source of revenue for a telehealth CMM service. Overall, study results indicate that telehealth CMM services, in select cases, may be associated with improved clinical outcomes, but the methods of the included studies were not homogenous enough to conclude that telehealth or hybrid modalities were superior to in-person CMM. To understand the full impact on the Quadruple Aim, additional research is needed to investigate the financial outcomes of CMM conducted using telehealth or hybrid technologies.Copyright © 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
ABSTRACT
In April 2020 in order to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19 on the territory of the Russian Federation, strict quarantine measures were introduced. In the shortest possible time, a large number of general hospitals were repurposed into COVID hospitals, recommendations were issued on the management of patients with a new coronavirus infection based on the existing global experience. The limited resources of the healthcare system in a pandemic require research into the pharmacoeconomic aspects of COVID-19. In the course of the study, a continuous retrospective analysis of the case histories of 6255 patients admitted to the Central Clinical Hospital RZD-Medicine was carried out. During the study period, 22% of patients received biological therapy. The average mortality rate of patients on biological therapy is 11.6%. An individual selection of the therapeutic dose of low molecular weight heparins was carried out, which showed high clinical efficacy. The developed methods were assessed from the perspective of pharmacoeconomics. The increase in the degree of damage to the lung tissue in patients with COVID-19, as well as the presence of concomitant diseases, entails an increase in the cost of treatment. Biotherapy can reduce the cost of treating patients with CT-4 by 16% by reducing the length of stay in the intensive care unit, the need for mechanical ventilation and reducing mortality.Copyright © 2021 Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persons with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection have an increased risk of pregnancy-related complications. However, data on acute cardiovascular complications during delivery admissions remain limited. OBJECTIVE(S): To determine whether birthing individuals with COVID-19 have an increased risk of acute peripartum cardiovascular complications during their delivery admission. METHOD(S): This population-based retrospective cohort study used the National Inpatient Sample (2020) by utilizing ICD-10 codes to identify delivery admissions with a diagnosis of COVID-19. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to report an adjusted odds ratio for the association between COVID-19 and acute peripartum cardiovascular complications. RESULT(S): A total of 3,458,691 weighted delivery admissions were identified, of which 1.3% were among persons with COVID-19 (n=46,375). Persons with COVID-19 were younger (median 28 vs. 29 years, p<0.01) and had a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm births and Cesarean delivery (p<0.01). After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, insurance, and income, COVID-19 remained an independent predictor of peripartum cardiovascular complications including preeclampsia (aOR 1.33 [1.29-1.37]), peripartum cardiomyopathy (aOR 2.09 [1.54-2,84]), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (aOR 12.94 [8.85-18.90]), and cardiac arrhythmias (aOR 1.55 [1.45-1.67]) compared with no COVID-19. Likewise, the risk of in-hospital mortality, AKI, stroke, pulmonary edema, and VTE was higher with COVID-19. For resource utilization, cost of hospitalization ($5,374 vs. $4,837, p<0.01) was higher for deliveries among persons with COVID-19. CONCLUSION(S): Persons with COVID-19 had a higher risk of preeclampsia, peripartum cardiomyopathy, ACS, arrhythmias, in-hospital mortality, pulmonary edema, AKI, stroke, and VTE during delivery hospitalizations. This was associated with an increased cost of hospitalization. Keywords: COVID-19, Pregnancy, GDM, PCOS, Preeclampsia, CVD, Cardiovascular Disease Abbreviations: COVID-19: Coronavirus disease-2019, GDM: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, PCOS: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, National Inpatient Sample: NIS, AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HCUP: the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Funding and Conflicts of Interest Dr. Michos reports Advisory Board participation for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Amarin, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Esperion, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The spread of the aggressive disease caused by the novel respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had an impact not only on the health and psyche of people, but also on the state of health systems in different countries, by complicating the treatment and diagnostic process. These changes have affected patients with cancers to a greater extent. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients are of particular scientific and practical interest when working in conditions of special anti-epidemic control. Objective. To assess the possibility of reducing the frequency of hospitalization of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) during the Covid-19 period. Subjects and methods. Sixty-four patients with urinary tract malignancy, including 19 (29.7%) patients with low-and high-risk re-current NMIBC, were followed up in two clinics (Saint Petersburg, Russia) in March to October 2020. All the patients were oper-ated on;the patients at high risk for recurrence received a cycle of adjuvant BCG therapy. Methods for cytological examination of urine sediment and the biomarkers UBC and Cyfra 21-1 were used for special laboratory diagnosis;the server stations of both clinics were applied for telehealth consultations (TCs). Results. TCs were used to reduce hospitalization rates: after TCs, all the patients reported a reduction in transport costs and recovery time after hospitalization. TCs could protect the followed-up patients against COVID-19 infection, by observing the rules of clinical examination, and achieve maximum individualization of treatment. The authors refused to perform diagnostic operations for low-risk NMIBC and to use laboratory tests using urinary biomarkers. At the place of their residence, outpatients underwent urinalysis for several indicators, transmitting the result to the clinic's servers or through a monitoring system. Inpatient treatment was used only in cases of gross hematuria or after recording abnormal laboratory test results. Control cystoscopy detected no re-current tumor. Conclusion. During the spread of COVID-19, the periods of endoscopic examinations and control diagnostic operations can be post-poned, by replacing face-to-face consultations with TC monitoring. Outpatient laboratory and radiation examinations are indicat-ed in patients with new-onset gross hematuria or after combination treatment. Repeated operations, including diagnostic ones, should be performed in the case of multiple NMIBCs or after incomplete excision of the primary tumor.Copyright © 2021.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research is to describe the use of telemedicine applied to patients characterised by a particular state of illness, which often drives them toward a frail and chronic status, in a systematic manner. This work employed the Tranfield approach to carry out a systematic literature review (SLR), in order to provide an efficient and high-quality method for identifying and evaluating extensive studies. The methodology was pursued step by step, analysing keywords, topics, journal quality to arrive at a set of relevant open access papers that was analysed in detail. The same papers were compared to each other and then, they were categorised according to significant metrics, also evaluating technologies and methods employed. Through our systematic review we found that most of the patients involved in telemedicine programs agreed with this service model and the clinical results appeared encouraging. Findings suggested that telemedicine services were appreciated by patients, they increased the access to care and could be a better way to face emergencies and pandemics, lowering overall costs and promoting social inclusion.Copyright © 2022 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
ABSTRACT
The authors explain the main changes in the Russian model of diagnosis-related groups used for medical care payment from the funds of compulsory health insurance in 2021 compared to 2020. New diagnosis-related groups for payment for treatment of patients with malignancies of lymphoid and hematopoietic tissues, treatment and follow-up of patients with new coronavirus in-fection, rehabilitation after COVID-19 and cancer, surgical treatment of large and giant hernias with mesh implants are described. The authors discuss expanding the list of classification criteria for diagnosis-related groups, updating of approaches to cost weight coefficients for calculation of cost of antineoplastic treatment.Copyright © 2021, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.